Comments on: Gail Riplinger Answers D.A. Waite Regarding Divorces http://jacklamb.name/2010/01/28/gail-riplinger-answers-d-a-waite-regarding-divorces/ musings on the Bible, ministry, and family Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:47:48 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jack Lamb http://jacklamb.name/2010/01/28/gail-riplinger-answers-d-a-waite-regarding-divorces/comment-page-1/#comment-8944 Jack Lamb Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:00:30 +0000 http://jacklamb.name/?p=354#comment-8944 Hi Jenelle, Gail Riplinger rejects the study of Greek and Hebrew because she says all study tools are corrupt in her book <em>Hazardous Materials</em>. Somehow she understands Hebrew and Greek without training and with every possible training tool being corrupt. It's very foolish. God clearly inspired His Word and preserved those original words as he promised. I believe the KJV is a faithful, completely trustworthy translation of those pure words. However, ignoring the fact that God did not choose to reveal His words in English isn't wise. Diligent study of God's Word with every possible tool is vital to being an approved workman. Hi Jenelle, Gail Riplinger rejects the study of Greek and Hebrew because she says all study tools are corrupt in her book Hazardous Materials. Somehow she understands Hebrew and Greek without training and with every possible training tool being corrupt. It’s very foolish.

God clearly inspired His Word and preserved those original words as he promised. I believe the KJV is a faithful, completely trustworthy translation of those pure words. However, ignoring the fact that God did not choose to reveal His words in English isn’t wise. Diligent study of God’s Word with every possible tool is vital to being an approved workman.

]]> By: Jenelle http://jacklamb.name/2010/01/28/gail-riplinger-answers-d-a-waite-regarding-divorces/comment-page-1/#comment-8943 Jenelle Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:45:47 +0000 http://jacklamb.name/?p=354#comment-8943 You seem to misunderstand. Gail Riplinger may be one that cannot be trusted. However, saying that King James Bible believers don't believe in the Greek and Hebrew originals is wrong. The King James Bible was translated from manuscripts that have their origin in Antioch, while the new Bible perversions are translated and reworked every few years (thus obtaining new copyrights) from corrupt manuscripts which originated in Egypt. There were corrupt manuscripts early on so the seminary "pastors" claim that early manuscripts are automatically "more correct" and reliable is absolutely false. In addition, the corrupt manuscripts have always been used by the Roman Catholic "church" and are now being used for the modern versions. The modern Protestant versions are Roman Catholic. That is why the mainstream "church" is becoming ecumenical, "dialoging" and having "common ground." We are in the time the New Testament calls the falling away before the appearance of the anti-Christ. It is absurd to think that God wouldn't allow the regular people to have the pure Bible in their own language. English has been the world language for awhile now. The Greek was the common language also and the Scriptures were preserved in other languages after the Greek and Hebrew. Even Jesus didn't have the original Hebrew parchments in his hand when he read the Scriptures. They were copies. He had preserved His word. He gave no indication, that one had to continually try to find out what was in the original parchments like our so intelligent scholars tell us today. You need to do more research, desiring to know the truth. You seem to misunderstand. Gail Riplinger may be one that cannot be trusted. However, saying that King James Bible believers don’t believe in the Greek and Hebrew originals is wrong. The King James Bible was translated from manuscripts that have their origin in Antioch, while the new Bible perversions are translated and reworked every few years (thus obtaining new copyrights) from corrupt manuscripts which originated in Egypt. There were corrupt manuscripts early on so the seminary “pastors” claim that early manuscripts are automatically “more correct” and reliable is absolutely false. In addition, the corrupt manuscripts have always been used by the Roman Catholic “church” and are now being used for the modern versions. The modern Protestant versions are Roman Catholic. That is why the mainstream “church” is becoming ecumenical, “dialoging” and having “common ground.” We are in the time the New Testament calls the falling away before the appearance of the anti-Christ. It is absurd to think that God wouldn’t allow the regular people to have the pure Bible in their own language. English has been the world language for awhile now. The Greek was the common language also and the Scriptures were preserved in other languages after the Greek and Hebrew. Even Jesus didn’t have the original Hebrew parchments in his hand when he read the Scriptures. They were copies. He had preserved His word. He gave no indication, that one had to continually try to find out what was in the original parchments like our so intelligent scholars tell us today. You need to do more research, desiring to know the truth.

]]> By: Alvin http://jacklamb.name/2010/01/28/gail-riplinger-answers-d-a-waite-regarding-divorces/comment-page-1/#comment-3231 Alvin Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:15:09 +0000 http://jacklamb.name/?p=354#comment-3231 Correction: Riplinger does not answer anyone about her divorces in this latest tirade. In fact, never once mentions her divorces. If she did, she would have to actually acknowledge them, which she refuses to do-most likely because she knows they are no justifiable by scripture. So, the best she can do in this is attack everyone with whom she holds a grudge. Correction: Riplinger does not answer anyone about her divorces in this latest tirade. In fact, never once mentions her divorces. If she did, she would have to actually acknowledge them, which she refuses to do-most likely because she knows they are no justifiable by scripture. So, the best she can do in this is attack everyone with whom she holds a grudge.

]]>