Godward Thoughts

The following is from Why Christians Should Believe in a Global Flood by Henry Morris

Biblical Reasons

A few of the many Biblical reasons for believing in the global Flood are briefly summarized below. For those who believe in the Bible as the inerrant word of God, these should be sufficient.

1. Jesus Christ believed the Old Testament record of the worldwide Flood. Speaking of the antediluvian population, He said: “The flood came, and took them all away” (Matthew 24:39). Evolutionary anthropologists are all convinced that people had spread over the entire Earth by the time assigned to Noah in Biblical chronology, so an anthropologically universal Flood would clearly have required a geographically worldwide Flood.
2. The apostle Peter believed in a worldwide hydraulic cataclysm. “Whereby the world [Greek, kosmos] that then was, being overflowed [Greek, katakluzo] with water, perished” (II Peter 3:6). The “world” was defined in the previous verse as “the heavens . . . and the earth.” Peter also said that “God . . . spared not the old world, but saved Noah . . . bringing in the flood [Greek, kataklusmos] upon the world of the ungodly” (II Peter 2:5). Note also that these words katakluzo and kataklusmos (from which we derive our English word “cataclysm”) are applied exclusively in the New Testament to the great Flood of Noah’s day.
3. The Old Testament record of the Flood, which both Christ and Peter accepted as real history, clearly teaches a global Flood. Therefore, it seems to us that Christians, professing to believe in Christ and follow Him, can do no less. For example, the record emphasizes that “all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven . . . and the mountains were covered” (Genesis 7:19,20) with the waters of the Flood. This must have included Mount Ararat on which Noah’s Ark landed, and which is now 17,000 feet high. This was no local flood!
4. Since “all flesh died that moved upon the earth . . . all that was in the dry land” (Genesis 7:21,22), Noah and his sons had to build a huge Ark to preserve animal life for the post-diluvian world—an Ark that can easily be shown to have had more than ample capacity to carry at least two of every known species of land animal (marine animals were not involved, of course). Such an ark was absurdly unnecessary for anything but a global Flood.
5. God promised that never “shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth” (Genesis 9:11), and He has kept His word for over four thousand years, if the Flood indeed was global. Those Christians who say it was a local flood, however, are in effect accusing God of lying, for there are many devastating local floods every year.

Scientific Reasons

The earth’s surface and sedimentary crust also bear strong witness to the historicity of a worldwide Flood, and the early geologists (Steno, Woodward, etc.) taught this. Most modern geologists have argued, on the other hand, that the earth’s crust was formed slowly over billions of years. Yes, but consider the following significant facts.

1. All the mountains of the world have been under water at some time or times in the past, as indicated by sedimentary rocks and marine fossils near their summits. Even most volcanic mountains with their pillow lavas seem largely to have been formed when under water.
2. Most of the earth’s crust consists of sedimentary rocks (sandstones, shales, limestones, etc.). These were originally formed in almost all cases under water, usually by deposition after transportation by water from various sources.
3. The assigned “ages” of the sedimentary beds (which comprise the bulk of the “geologic column”) have been deduced from their assemblages of fossils. Fossils, however, normally require very rapid burial and compaction to be preserved at all. Thus every sedimentary formation appears to have been formed rapidly—even catastrophically—and more and more present-day geologists are returning to this point of view.
4. Since there is known to be a global continuity of sedimentary formations in the geologic column (that is, there is no worldwide “unconformity,” or time gap, between successive “ages”), and since each unit was formed rapidly, the entire geologic column seems to be the product of continuous rapid deposition of sediments, comprising in effect the geological record of a time when “the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished.”
5. It is also significant that the types of rocks, the vast extent of specific sedimentary rock formations, the minerals and metals, coal and oil found in rocks, the various types of structures (i.e., faults, folds, thrusts, etc.), sedimentary rocks grossly deformed while still soft from recent deposition, and numerous other features seem to occur indiscriminately throughout the various “ages” supposedly represented in the column. To all outward appearances, therefore, they were all formed in essentially the same brief time period.
6. The fossil sequences in the sedimentary rocks do not constitute a legitimate exception to this rule, for there is a flagrant circular reasoning process involved in using them to identify their supposed geologic age. That is, the fossils have been dated by the rocks where they are found, which in turn had been dated by their imbedded fossils with the sequences based on their relative assumed stages of evolution, which had ultimately been based on the ancient philosophy of the “great chain of being.” Instead of representing the evolution of life over many ages, the fossils really speak of the destruction of life (remember that fossils are dead things, catastrophically buried for preservation) in one age, with their actual local “sequences” having been determined by the ecological communities in which they were living at the time of burial.
7. The fact that there are traditions of the great Flood found in hundreds of tribes in all parts of the world (all similar in one way or another to that in the Genesis record) is firm evidence that those tribes all originated from the one family preserved through the cataclysm.

UPDATE: What does “Kenite” mean?

“And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain…” so begins Genesis 4. That seems pretty plain – Cain is born from a union of Adam and Eve. I have recently come into contact with folks that do not believe this! Their teaching is called “the serpent seed doctrine.” In brief, the doctrine teaches that Eve’s sin in the garden was not disobedience but sexual contact with the serpent! As a result of this sexual contact with the serpent Cain was born. My initial reaction to this peculiar theology was “You’ve got to be kidding me!” Since I interact regularly with some folks who believe this, I thought I would investigate it in this post. The truth about the serpent’s seed is found in Genesis 3:15, where the first reference is made to the coming Redeemer Who will destroy Satan and his seed. In John 8:44, Jesus makes it clear that unbelievers are serpent’s seed: “Ye are of your father the devil…” This new “serpent seed doctrine” comes from the serpent himself (1 Timothy 4:1).

One of Satan’s messengers for this false doctrine is Arnold Murray of the Shepherd’s Chapel. Murray teaches that the Kenites are the descendants of Cain. According to Murray, the Kenites survived the global flood and continue to this day (source: www.carm.org). Obviously, Murray must not believe what God’s Word says concerning the flood (Genesis 7:21-22). He states plainly of Kenites on the Shepherd’s Chapel website:

It is a Hebrew word that has only one meaning, “sons of Cain.”

This Hebrew definition was apparently concocted by Murray. Upon examining Strong’s Concordance, the word means “a Kenite or member of the tribe of Kajin.” The Brown-Driver-Briggs’ Definitions gives this meaning: “Kenite = “smiths” 1) the tribe from which the father-in-law of Moses was a member and which lived in the area between southern Palestine and the mountains of Sinai.” Two standard Hebrew lexical references do not have the “only one meaning” of the word according to Arnold Murray.

The only way this wacky doctrine can be supported is by abandoning a literal interpretation of Scripture. Serpent must not mean serpent (how could a woman and a snake have intercourse?). Genesis 4:1 must not mean what it says (Adam is the father of Cain). There is no sense in answering any other arguments from Murray. By not accepting his teaching, it is probably just because I am a Kenite – child of Satan (according to Murray).

What are the consequences of believing in the serpent seed doctrine?

1. The Scriptures cannot be trusted. If they could, then a plain reading of the Bible could be believed instead of Arnold Murray’s perverse twisting of the Word (which defies logic and context).
2. If a literal interpretation of the Scriptures is thrown out, then the Words of Scripture have no authority. The meaning is up to each individual’s imagination.

Fortunately, we do not have to depend on the teachings of Arnold Murray or any other man to reveal hidden or lost truths in the Scriptures. We just need to read the Scriptures with an open heart and mind to receive God’s truth.

I am excited about blogging through the Bible this year! I hope you will follow along with me in an incredible journey through God’s Word! Please post your comments each day as you read!

I must begin today by noting that I have a firm belief in the authority and inspiration of the Genesis account of creation. A plain reading of the Bible reveals that God created the world in seven literal days. This view obviously conflicts with the notion of evolution. If you want to explore the scientific evidence against evolution and for a special creation, read The Scientific Case Against Evolution at the ICR website.

Some brief thoughts on the creation: All 3 of the Trinity are involved in creation (Genesis 1:1, 2; John 1:3). The creation was mature and fruit-bearing instantly (1:11). The emphasis of each animal reproducing “after his kind” makes evolution impossible. God’s command to “replenish” the earth does not mean their was a race of people prior to Adam & Eve (1:28). Answers in Genesis has an excellent article attesting to this truth and the accuracy of the King James Version in this verse. In this perfect world Adam had to work! (2:15) Woman was created for man as fitting help for his labor (2:18).

Genesis is very important for the believer. The truth of creation and man’s fall in chapter 3 form the basis of the rest of the Bible. To tear them down is to destroy the very purpose and foundation of the gospel. Some Christians seem to think views of origins are not important, but Satan knows different. He seeks to destroy the foundation of God’s Word.

Chapter 3 gives the fall of man with the resulting consequence of suffering, death, and judgment. We also have the first promise of a Redeemer (3:15).

That’s all for today. Some days will have more; some will have less. Thanks for joining me on my journey through God’s Word this year!